Skip Navigation

IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 2001 12(1):75-88; doi:10.1093/imaman/12.1.75
© 2001 by Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christer, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Van Der Duyn Schouten, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The robustness of the semi-Markov and delay time single-component inspection models to the Markov assumption

A. H. Christer1, W. Wang1, K. Choi1 and F. A. Van Der Duyn Schouten2

1 Centre for Operational Research and Applied Statistics, University of Salford, UK 2 Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, The Netherlands

The context of planned preventive maintenance lends itself readily to probabilistic modelling. Indeed, many of the published theoretical models to be found in the literature adopt a Markov approach, where states are usually ‘operating’, ‘operating at one of several levels of deterioration’, and ‘failed’. However, most of these models assume the required Markovian property and do not address the issue of testing the assumption, or the related task of estimating parameters. It is possible that data are inadequate to test the assumption, or that the Markov property is believed to be not strictly valid, but acceptable as an approximation. In this paper we consider within a specific inspection–maintenance context the robustness of a Markov-based model when the Markov assumption is not valid. This is achieved by comparing the output of an exact delay time model of an inspection–maintenance problem with that of a semi-Markov approximation. The importance of establishing the vadility of the Markov property in the modelling application is highlighted. If the plant behaviour is seen to be nearly Markov, in the case considered the semi-Markov model gives a good approximation to the exact model. Conversley if the Markov assumption is not a good approximation, the semi-Markov model can lead to inappropriate advice.

Keywords: inspection; semi-Markov decision process; delay time model; maintenance


Received 15 May 2001. Accepted 13 August 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.