Skip Navigation

IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 1992 4(1):73-80; doi:10.1093/imaman/4.1.73
© 1992 by Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLACKWELL, M.
Right arrow Articles by SYKES, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The assignment of credit limits with a behaviour-scoring system

MARTIN BLACKWELL and CHRIS SYKES

Freemans plc

Received on 1 July 1991. Behaviour-scoring systems for authorizations enable the risk of a customer defaulting to be quantified. These risks must be incorporated into a credit strategy which assigns credit limits and makes authorization decisions in the most effective manner. This paper introduces the concept of marginal risk which has proved a useful tool in defining credit limit strategies for a mail-order company.

Behaviour scores for authorizations are similar to credit application scores in that they predict the overall risk of a customer defaulting. If a cut-off risk can be established, then the optimal strategy would appear to be to withhold credit for customers exceeding this risk and to grant unlimited credit for the remainder (this is analogous to application strategies). The notion of granting unlimited credit is often commercially unacceptable (particularly if customers are to be informed of their credit limits!) and so strategies which give all or nothing are of limited value and need further refinement.

In order to overcome this problem, the concept of marginal risk has been devised. The marginal risk is the risk of the ‘last £’ of an account being defaulted. This reflects the fact that small-balance customers may well pay off their current balance only to default on larger subsequent purchases. Although the overall risk of customers with a given behaviour score defaulting is relatively constant, their marginal risk will vary according to their outstanding balance. This paper explores the relationships between marginal risk and overall risk and between marginal risk and outstanding balance. A model which summarizes these relationships is proposed, and contours of equal marginal risk are built on the basis of this model. These contours provide strategies for allocating credit limits which are both practical and optimal for a well formulated cut-off risk and which suggest that the probability of defaulting is not the best criterion for allocating credit limits.

The results of the application of this approach will be demonstrated. Some of the problems that have been overcome are discussed, as are some of the outstanding problems.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.