Skip Navigation



IMA Journal of Management Mathematics Advance Access published online on June 25, 2009

IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, doi:10.1093/imaman/dpp013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broll, U.
Right arrow Articles by Lukas, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The authors 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. All rights reserved.

Hedging mean-reverting commodities

Udo Broll{dagger}

Department of Business Management and Economics, Dresden University of Technology, 01062 Dresden, Germany

Ephraim Clark

Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, UK, and Univ. Lille Nord de France, Lille School of Finance, Euralille 59777, France

Elmar Lukas

Department of Economics, University of Paderborn, 33098 Paderborn, Germany

{dagger} Email: udo.broll{at}tu-dresden.de

Received on 2 July 2008. Accepted on 22 May 2009.

This paper uses the expected utility framework to examine the optimal hedging decision for commodities with mean-reverting price processes. The derived results show that when commodity prices follow a mean-reverting process, the optimal hedge ratio differs significantly from the classical results found under standard geometric Brownian motion. Hence, a failure to accommodate mean reversion when it exists can lead to systematic biases in hedging decisions.

Keywords: commodity price risk; hedging; mean reverting


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.